↓ Skip to main content

Epistemology of the origin of cancer: a new paradigm

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epistemology of the origin of cancer: a new paradigm
Published in
BMC Cancer, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Björn LDM Brücher, Ijaz S Jamall

Abstract

Carcinogenesis is widely thought to originate from somatic mutations and an inhibition of growth suppressors, followed by cell proliferation, tissue invasion, and risk of metastasis. Fewer than 10% of all cancers are hereditary; the ratio in gastric (1%), colorectal (3-5%) and breast (8%) cancers is even less. Cancers caused by infection are thought to constitute some 15% of the non-hereditary cancers. Those remaining, 70 to 80%, are called "sporadic," because they are essentially of unknown etiology. We propose a new paradigm for the origin of the majority of cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 186 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 45 24%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 47 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#802,547
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#99
of 9,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,516
of 241,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#2
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,000 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.