↓ Skip to main content

A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecological Surgery, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 157)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
Published in
Gynecological Surgery, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10397-013-0824-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Wallwiener, Philippe Robert Koninckx, Andreas Hackethal, Hans Brölmann, Per Lundorff, Michal Mara, Arnaud Wattiez, Rudy Leon De Wilde, for The Anti-Adhesions in Gynecology Expert Panel (ANGEL)

Abstract

The present survey was conducted among gynaecological surgeons from several European countries to assess the actual knowledge and practice related to post-surgical adhesions and measures for reduction. From September 1, 2012 to February 6, 2013, gynaecological surgeons were invited to answer an 18-item online questionnaire accessible through the ESGE website. This questionnaire contained eight questions on care settings and surgical practice and ten questions on adhesion formation and adhesion reduction. Four hundred fourteen surgeons participated; 70.8 % agreed that adhesions are a source of major morbidity. About half of them declared that adhesions represented an important part of their daily medical and surgical work. About two thirds informed their patients about the risk of adhesion. Most cited causes of adhesions were abdominal infections and extensive tissue trauma, and endometriosis and myomectomy surgery. Fewer surgeons expected adhesion formation after laparoscopy (18.9 %) than after laparotomy (40.8 %); 60 % knew the surgical techniques recommended to reduce adhesions; only 44.3 % used adhesion-reduction agents on a regular basis. This survey gives a broad picture of adhesion awareness amongst European gynaecological surgeons, mainly from Germany and the UK. The participants had a good knowledge of factors causing adhesions. Knowledge of surgical techniques recommended and use of anti-adhesion agents developed to reduce adhesions need to be improved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,009,985
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#13
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,821
of 306,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them