↓ Skip to main content

Increased range of motion after static stretching is not due to changes in muscle and tendon structures

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biomechanics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,166)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
207 tweeters
facebook
26 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased range of motion after static stretching is not due to changes in muscle and tendon structures
Published in
Clinical Biomechanics, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.04.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konrad A, Tilp M, Andreas Konrad, Markus Tilp

Abstract

It is known that static stretching is an appropriate means of increasing the range of motion, but information in the literature about the mechanical adaptation of the muscle-tendon unit is scarce. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a six-week static stretching training program on the structural and functional parameters of the human gastrocnemius medialis muscle and the Achilles tendon.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 207 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 197 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 25%
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Other 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 64 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 34%
Sports and Recreations 42 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 16%
Unspecified 28 13%
Engineering 11 5%
Other 25 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2018.
All research outputs
#67,423
of 11,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#3
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,206
of 188,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.