↓ Skip to main content

Increased range of motion after static stretching is not due to changes in muscle and tendon structures

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biomechanics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 2,241)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
228 X users
facebook
26 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
8 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased range of motion after static stretching is not due to changes in muscle and tendon structures
Published in
Clinical Biomechanics, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.04.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Konrad, Markus Tilp

Abstract

It is known that static stretching is an appropriate means of increasing the range of motion, but information in the literature about the mechanical adaptation of the muscle-tendon unit is scarce. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a six-week static stretching training program on the structural and functional parameters of the human gastrocnemius medialis muscle and the Achilles tendon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 389 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 20%
Student > Bachelor 60 15%
Other 39 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Other 78 20%
Unknown 82 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 23%
Sports and Recreations 77 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 18%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Engineering 11 3%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 105 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#217,570
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#7
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,703
of 241,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.