↓ Skip to main content

The anatomy of a (potential) disaster: Volcanoes, behavior, and population viability of the short-tailed albatross (Phoebastria albatrus)

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The anatomy of a (potential) disaster: Volcanoes, behavior, and population viability of the short-tailed albatross (Phoebastria albatrus)
Published in
Biological Conservation, February 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.013
Authors

M.E. Finkelstein, S. Wolf, M. Goldman, D.F. Doak, P.R. Sievert, G. Balogh, H. Hasegawa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 40%
Environmental Science 22 31%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 13 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2014.
All research outputs
#11,965,675
of 21,575,819 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,765
of 5,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,168
of 204,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#26
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,575,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.