↓ Skip to main content

Argon: Neuroprotection in in vitro models of cerebral ischemia and traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Argon: Neuroprotection in in vitro models of cerebral ischemia and traumatic brain injury
Published in
Critical Care, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc8214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip D Loetscher, Jan Rossaint, Rolf Rossaint, Joachim Weis, Michael Fries, Astrid Fahlenkamp, Yu-Mi Ryang, Oliver Grottke, Mark Coburn

Abstract

Recently, it has been shown in several experimental settings that the noble gases xenon and helium have neuroprotective properties. In this study we tested the hypothesis that the noble gas argon has a neuroprotective potential as well. Since traumatic brain injury and stroke are widespread and generate an enormous economic and social burden, we investigated the possible neuroprotective effect in in vitro models of traumatic brain injury and cerebral ischemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 17%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,793
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,410
of 165,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.