You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
National Patterns of Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia: Update on Publicly Reported Outcomes Measures Based on the 2013 Release
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-2862-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa G. Suter, Shu-Xia Li, Jacqueline N. Grady, Zhenqiu Lin, Yongfei Wang, Kanchana R. Bhat, Dima Turkmani, Steven B. Spivack, Peter K. Lindenauer, Angela R. Merrill, Elizabeth E. Drye, Harlan M. Krumholz, Susannah M. Bernheim |
| Abstract |
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publicly reports risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) within 30-days of admission and, in 2013, risk-standardized unplanned readmission rates (RSRRs) within 30-days of discharge for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia. Current publicly reported data do not focus on variation in national results or annual changes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 58% |
| Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,628,588
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,270
of 8,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,728
of 242,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#10
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.