@ZackHawes8 @krzysztofcipora @EdNeuroLab @etoomari Somewhat related to your question is also this article from 2017, in which we showed that the directional SNARC effects and the bias in the line bisection task with numerical flankers did not correlate for
936 followers
936 followers
@clelandpsych @lindskog_m @NumCog @RebeccaBull3 I think it is clear that SNAs are modulated by learning and experience. The culture-specific directionality (Shaki & Fischer) suggests this, our 2016 learning study suggests this, the stronger association
253 followers
@tuebang related recent work by @ManuelNinaus , who observed SNARC reliabilty of r=.93-96 for young adults-elderly participants, key features - N=25 (in each group) - Parity Judgment - Repetitions (40) - Stimuli (only 1, 2, 8, and 9) - Split-half reliabili
936 followers
RT @ManuelNinaus: @tuebang @NumCog @mhf31415 and here it is https://t.co/P9yoTzT4ws thanks for tweeting about it :) #openaccess #numericalc…