You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of walking performance over the first 2 minutes and the full 6 minutes of the Six-Minute Walk Test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-269 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard W Bohannon, Deborah Bubela, Susan Magasi, Heather McCreath, Ying-Chih Wang, David Reuben, William Z Rymer, Richard Gershon |
| Abstract |
Although the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), as recommended by the American Thoracic Society, is widely used as a measure of functional endurance, it may not be applicable in some settings and populations. We sought to examine, therefore, performance over the first 2 minutes and the full 6 minutes of the 6MWT. Specifically, we investigated completion rates, distances walked, test-retest reliability, and the relationship between distances walked over the first 2 and the full 6 minutes of the 6MWT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 78 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,015
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,921
of 226,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#58
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.