↓ Skip to main content

Does weight lifting improve visual acuity? A replication of Gonzalo-Fonrodona and Porras (2013)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does weight lifting improve visual acuity? A replication of Gonzalo-Fonrodona and Porras (2013)
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2699-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fumiya Yonemitsu, Yubin Sung, Kyoko Naka, Yuki Yamada, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos

Abstract

A physical effort such as lifting up a weight affects our perception and cognition. A previous study reported in two experiments that weight lifting improves visual acuity. In the previous study, participants' visual acuity was higher while lifting weights than while resting. Moreover, via a case study, that study further showed that the heavier the weight, the better the visual acuity. These experiments, although interesting, lacked methodological details and thorough statistical analyses. We thus conducted experiments similar to these two previous ones that mitigated these issues. Although our results of Experiment 1 echoed those of the previous study, the results of Experiment 2 did not support the latter case report. Thus, our results suggest that the bodily experience of weights improves visual acuity, but a gradual increase in weight does not seem to lead to a gradual increase in visual acuity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 18%
Unspecified 2 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%