↓ Skip to main content

Personalized organ donation directives: saving lives with PODDs

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personalized organ donation directives: saving lives with PODDs
Published in
Critical Care, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13872
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Lecturer 2 18%
Professor 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 73%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#3,080,534
of 4,504,824 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,994
of 2,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,124
of 108,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#121
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,504,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.