↓ Skip to main content

Barrier island habitat map and vegetation survey—Dauphin Island, Alabama, 2015

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barrier island habitat map and vegetation survey—Dauphin Island, Alabama, 2015
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/ofr20171083
Authors

Enwright, Nicholas M., Borchert, Sinéad M., Day, Richard H., Feher, Laura C., Osland, Michael J., Wang, Lei, Wang, Hongqing

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,900,961
of 11,727,438 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#557
of 1,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,221
of 267,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#44
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,727,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.