↓ Skip to main content

Implications of the Admixture Process in Skin Color Molecular Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implications of the Admixture Process in Skin Color Molecular Assessment
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096886
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caio Cesar Silva de Cerqueira, Tábita Hünemeier, Jorge Gomez-Valdés, Virgínia Ramallo, Carla Daiana Volasko-Krause, Ana Angélica Leal Barbosa, Pedro Vargas-Pinilla, Rodrigo Ciconet Dornelles, Danaê Longo, Francisco Rothhammer, Gabriel Bedoya, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros, Victor Acuña-Alonzo, Carla Gallo, Giovanni Poletti, Rolando González-José, Francisco Mauro Salzano, Sídia Maria Callegari-Jacques, Lavínia Schuler-Faccini, Andrés Ruiz-Linares, Maria Cátira Bortolini

Abstract

The understanding of the complex genotype-phenotype architecture of human pigmentation has clear implications for the evolutionary history of humans, as well as for medical and forensic practices. Although dozens of genes have previously been associated with human skin color, knowledge about this trait remains incomplete. In particular, studies focusing on populations outside the European-North American axis are rare, and, until now, admixed populations have seldom been considered. The present study was designed to help fill this gap. Our objective was to evaluate possible associations of 18 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), located within nine genes, and one pseudogene with the Melanin Index (MI) in two admixed Brazilian populations (Gaucho, N = 352; Baiano, N = 148) with different histories of geographic and ethnic colonization. Of the total sample, four markers were found to be significantly associated with skin color, but only two (SLC24A5 rs1426654, and SLC45A2 rs16891982) were consistently associated with MI in both samples (Gaucho and Baiano). Therefore, only these 2 SNPs should be preliminarily considered to have forensic significance because they consistently showed the association independently of the admixture level of the populations studied. We do not discard that the other two markers (HERC2 rs1129038 and TYR rs1126809) might be also relevant to admixed samples, but additional studies are necessary to confirm the real importance of these markers for skin pigmentation. Finally, our study shows associations of some SNPs with MI in a modern Brazilian admixed sample, with possible applications in forensic genetics. Some classical genetic markers in Euro-North American populations are not associated with MI in our sample. Our results point out the relevance of considering population differences in selecting an appropriate set of SNPs as phenotype predictors in forensic practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 5%
Argentina 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 85 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Professor 8 9%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,349,015
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,643
of 202,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,730
of 229,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,388
of 4,749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.