↓ Skip to main content

Effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion on mandibular position: a three-dimensional study

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion on mandibular position: a three-dimensional study
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40510-017-0179-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Talles Fernando Medeiros Oliveira, Valfrido Antônio Pereira-Filho, Mario Francisco Real Gabrielli, Eduardo Sanches Gonçales, Ary Santos-Pinto

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate three-dimensional changes in mandibular position after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME). A retrospective study was carried out with tomographic records of 30 adult patients with maxillary transverse deficiency who underwent SARME. Cone beam computed tomography scans were obtained preoperatively (T1), after expansion (T2) and 6 months after expansion (T3). Mandibular landmarks were measured with respect to axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. Clockwise rotation and lateral displacement of the mandible were observed immediately after SARME. However, mandibular displacements tended to return close to their initial values at T3. Clockwise rotation and lateral shift of the mandible are transient effects of SARME.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 25%
Student > Postgraduate 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#81
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,526
of 323,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them