↓ Skip to main content

Multi-Scale Associations between Vegetation Cover and Woodland Bird Communities across a Large Agricultural Region

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-Scale Associations between Vegetation Cover and Woodland Bird Communities across a Large Agricultural Region
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0097029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Ikin, Philip S. Barton, Ingrid A. Stirnemann, John R. Stein, Damian Michael, Mason Crane, Sachiko Okada, David B. Lindenmayer

Abstract

Improving biodiversity conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes has become an important global issue. Vegetation at the patch and landscape-scale is important for species occupancy and diversity, yet few previous studies have explored multi-scale associations between vegetation and community assemblages. Here, we investigated how patch and landscape-scale vegetation cover structure woodland bird communities. We asked: (1) How is the bird community associated with the vegetation structure of woodland patches and the amount of vegetation cover in the surrounding landscape? (2) Do species of conservation concern respond to woodland vegetation structure and surrounding vegetation cover differently to other species in the community? And (3) Can the relationships between the bird community and the woodland vegetation structure and surrounding vegetation cover be explained by the ecological traits of the species comprising the bird community? We studied 103 woodland patches (0.5 - 53.8 ha) over two time periods across a large (6,800 km(2)) agricultural region in southeastern Australia. We found that both patch vegetation and surrounding woody vegetation cover were important for structuring the bird community, and that these relationships were consistent over time. In particular, the occurrence of mistletoe within the patches and high values of woody vegetation cover within 1,000 ha and 10,000 ha were important, especially for bird species of conservation concern. We found that the majority of these species displayed similar, positive responses to patch and landscape vegetation attributes. We also found that these relationships were related to the foraging and nesting traits of the bird community. Our findings suggest that management strategies to increase both remnant vegetation quality and the cover of surrounding woody vegetation in fragmented agricultural landscapes may lead to improved conservation of bird communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 105 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 45%
Environmental Science 34 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,916,248
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,340
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,914
of 228,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#583
of 4,677 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,677 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.