↓ Skip to main content

Resistance training using eccentric overload induces early adaptations in skeletal muscle size

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
411 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistance training using eccentric overload induces early adaptations in skeletal muscle size
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00421-007-0583-8
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-45792
Authors

Lena Norrbrand, James D. Fluckey, Marco Pozzo, Per A. Tesch

Abstract

Fifteen healthy men performed a 5-week training program comprising four sets of seven unilateral, coupled concentric-eccentric knee extensions 2-3 times weekly. While eight men were assigned to training using a weight stack (WS) machine, seven men trained using a flywheel (FW) device, which inherently provides variable resistance and allows for eccentric overload. The design of these apparatuses ensured similar knee extensor muscle use and range of motion. Before and after training, maximal isometric force (MVC) was measured in tasks non-specific to the training modes. Volume of all individual quadriceps muscles was determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Performance across the 12 exercise sessions was measured using the inherent features of the devices. Whereas MVC increased (P < 0.05) at all angles measured in FW, such a change was less consistent in WS. There was a marked increase (P < 0.05) in task-specific performance (i.e., load lifted) in WS. Average work showed a non-significant 8.7% increase in FW. Quadriceps muscle volume increased (P < 0.025) in both groups after training. Although the more than twofold greater hypertrophy evident in FW (6.2%) was not statistically greater than that shown in WS (3.0%), all four individual quadriceps muscles of FW showed increased (P < 0.025) volume whereas in WS only m. rectus femoris was increased (P < 0.025). Collectively the results of this study suggest more robust muscular adaptations following flywheel than weight stack resistance exercise supporting the idea that eccentric overload offers a potent stimuli essential to optimize the benefits of resistance exercise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 396 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 14%
Student > Bachelor 57 14%
Researcher 38 9%
Professor 23 6%
Other 78 19%
Unknown 81 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 192 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 98 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,320,490
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#423
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,413
of 83,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.