↓ Skip to main content

Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005654.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantale Dumoulin, E. Jean C Hay-Smith, Gabrielle Mac Habée-Séguin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 306 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 <1%
Unknown 305 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Unknown 305 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#189,715
of 13,202,405 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#455
of 10,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,046
of 189,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,202,405 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.