↓ Skip to main content

Successes and Failures of Pay for Performance in the United Kingdom

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
47 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Successes and Failures of Pay for Performance in the United Kingdom
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1056/nejmhpr1316051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Beth Hamel, Martin Roland, Stephen Campbell, Roland M, Campbell S, Roland, Martin, Campbell, Stephen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 4%
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 131 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 27 19%
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 12 8%
Other 44 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 43%
Social Sciences 20 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 9%
Unspecified 11 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 7%
Other 28 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#349,816
of 13,022,627 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#5,510
of 25,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,148
of 189,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#107
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,022,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.