You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003229.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martinez MJ, Bonfill X, Moreno RM, Vargas E, Capellà D |
Abstract |
Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a common condition caused by inadequate blood flow through the veins, usually in the lower limbs. It can result in considerable discomfort with symptoms such as pain, itchiness and tiredness in the legs. Sufferers may also experience swelling and ulcers. Phlebotonics are a class of drugs that are often used to treat CVI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Hungary | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 20% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 53% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,973,064
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,438
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,940
of 57,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.