↓ Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Epidemic Kaposi Sarcoma in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender Differences in Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Epidemic Kaposi Sarcoma in Uganda
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Warren Phipps, Fred Ssewankambo, Huong Nguyen, Misty Saracino, Anna Wald, Lawrence Corey, Jackson Orem, Andrew Kambugu, Corey Casper

Abstract

The incidence of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) has increased dramatically among women in sub-Saharan Africa since the onset of the HIV pandemic, but data on KS disease in women are limited. To identify gender-related differences in KS presentation and outcomes, we evaluated the clinical manifestations and response in men and women with AIDS-associated KS in Uganda.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 43%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,119,049
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95,191
of 214,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,724
of 105,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#506
of 999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.