You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Organic Farming and Landscape Structure: Effects on Insect-Pollinated Plant Diversity in Intensively Managed Grasslands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038073 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eileen F. Power, Daniel L. Kelly, Jane C. Stout |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 202 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 19% |
| Researcher | 40 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 22% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,232,378
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#78,432
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,681
of 166,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,081
of 3,749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.