↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog


63 Dimensions

Readers on

49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-2-33
Pubmed ID

Parvin Hakimi, Mark T Johnson, Jianqi Yang, David F Lepage, Ronald A Conlon, Satish C Kalhan, Lea Reshef, Shirley M Tilghman, Richard W Hanson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Chemistry 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 3 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2007.
All research outputs
of 12,487,019 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 263,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,487,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them