You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Difficult and failed intubation: Incident rates and maternal, obstetrical, and anesthetic predictors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-011-9491-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dolores M. McKeen, Ronald B. George, Colleen M. O’Connell, Victoria M. Allen, Murray Yazer, Meghan Wilson, Tom C. Phu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 28% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,712,873
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,408
of 2,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,265
of 121,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.