↓ Skip to main content

Polymicrobial airway bacterial communities in adult bronchiectasis patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polymicrobial airway bacterial communities in adult bronchiectasis patients
Published in
BMC Microbiology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-14-130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Purcell, Hannah Jary, Audrey Perry, John D Perry, Christopher J Stewart, Andrew Nelson, Clare Lanyon, Darren L Smith, Stephen P Cummings, Anthony De Soyza

Abstract

Chronic airway infection contributes to the underlying pathogenesis of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBr). In contrast to other chronic airway infections, associated with COPD and CF bronchiectasis, where polymicrobial communities have been implicated in lung damage due to the vicious circle of recurrent bacterial infections and inflammation, there is sparse information on the composition of bacterial communities in NCFBr. Seventy consecutive patients were recruited from an outpatient adult NCFBr clinic. Bacterial communities in sputum samples were analysed by culture and pyrosequencing approaches. Bacterial sequences were analysed using partial least square discrimination analyses to investigate trends in community composition and identify those taxa that contribute most to community variation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,405,709
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#713
of 3,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,325
of 226,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.