You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews by health policymakers and managers: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laure Perrier, Kelly Mrklas, John N Lavis, Sharon E Straus |
| Abstract |
Systematic reviews have the potential to inform decisions made by health policymakers and managers, yet little is known about the impact of interventions to increase the use of systematic reviews by these groups in decision making. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 20% |
| Researcher | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,272,274
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#710
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,598
of 110,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.