↓ Skip to main content

Androgenetic Alopecia: An Evidence-Based Treatment Update

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Androgenetic Alopecia: An Evidence-Based Treatment Update
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40257-014-0077-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Supenya Varothai, Wilma F. Bergfeld

Abstract

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is one of the most common chronic problems seen by dermatologists worldwide. It is characterized by progressive hair loss, especially of scalp hair, and has distinctive patterns of loss in women versus men, but in both genders the central scalp is most severely affected. It often begins around puberty and is known to effect self-esteem and the individual's quality of life. In contrast to the high prevalence of AGA, approved therapeutic options are limited. In addition to the scarce pharmacologic treatments, there are numerous nonprescription products claimed to be effective in restoring hair in androgenetic alopecia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 320 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Postgraduate 26 8%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Other 57 18%
Unknown 107 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 115 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,193,285
of 23,544,633 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#57
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,377
of 227,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.