You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing use and suitability of scanning electron microscopy in the analysis of micro remains in dental calculus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.016 |
| Authors |
Robert C. Power, Domingo C. Salazar-García, Roman M. Wittig, Amanda G. Henry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 25 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#2,131
of 2,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,728
of 248,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#53
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.