↓ Skip to main content

Assessing use and suitability of scanning electron microscopy in the analysis of micro remains in dental calculus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Science, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Assessing use and suitability of scanning electron microscopy in the analysis of micro remains in dental calculus
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Science, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.016
Authors

Robert C. Power, Domingo C. Salazar-García, Roman M. Wittig, Amanda G. Henry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 27%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 27%
Arts and Humanities 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Unspecified 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Other 17 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,522,302
of 12,034,300 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#1,253
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,307
of 190,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#26
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,034,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.