↓ Skip to main content

Altruism, happiness, and health: it’s good to be good

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,053)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
530 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altruism, happiness, and health: it’s good to be good
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 2005
DOI 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen G. Post

Abstract

Altruistic (other-regarding) emotions and behaviors are associated with greater well-being, health, and longevity. This article presents a summary and assessment of existing research data on altruism and its relation to mental and physical health. It suggests several complimentary interpretive frameworks, including evolutionary biology, physiological models, and positive psychology. Potential public health implications of this research are discussed, as well as directions for future studies. The article concludes, with some caveats, that a strong correlation exists between the well-being, happiness, health, and longevity of people who are emotionally and behaviorally compassionate, so long as they are not overwhelmed by helping tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 508 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 91 17%
Student > Bachelor 85 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 15%
Researcher 39 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 7%
Other 111 21%
Unknown 89 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 211 40%
Social Sciences 65 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 23 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20 4%
Other 86 16%
Unknown 103 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 384. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#81,582
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70
of 70,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them