You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0095660 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Rutherford, Dion Harmon, Justin Werfel, Alexander S. Gard-Murray, Shlomiya Bar-Yam, Andreas Gros, Ramon Xulvi-Brunet, Yaneer Bar-Yam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 215 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 5% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% |
| Finland | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 108 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 184 | 86% |
| Scientists | 22 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#176,848
of 25,895,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,637
of 225,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,351
of 241,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#54
of 4,641 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,895,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,641 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.