The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid waste
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-8-60 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Porta, Simona Milani, Antonio I Lazzarino, Carlo A Perucci, Francesco Forastiere |
| Abstract |
Management of solid waste (mainly landfills and incineration) releases a number of toxic substances, most in small quantities and at extremely low levels. Because of the wide range of pollutants, the different pathways of exposure, long-term low-level exposure, and the potential for synergism among the pollutants, concerns remain about potential health effects but there are many uncertainties involved in the assessment. Our aim was to systematically review the available epidemiological literature on the health effects in the vicinity of landfills and incinerators and among workers at waste processing plants to derive usable excess risk estimates for health impact assessment. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 356 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 19% |
| Researcher | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 19% |
| Unknown | 93 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 66 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 15% |
| Engineering | 24 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 20% |
| Unknown | 111 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,062,730
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#521
of 1,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,641
of 164,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.