↓ Skip to main content

Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorders with the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorders with the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0097630
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid Kruizinga, Janne C. Visser, Tamara van Batenburg-Eddes, Alice S. Carter, Wilma Jansen, Hein Raat

Abstract

Using parent-completed questionnaires in (preventive) child health care can facilitate the early detection of psychosocial problems and psychopathology, including autism spectrum disorders (ASD). A promising questionnaire for this purpose is the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA). The screening accuracy with regard to ASD of the BITSEA Problem and Competence scales and a newly calculated Autism score were evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Social Sciences 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,473,131
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,035
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,891
of 240,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#648
of 4,643 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,643 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.