↓ Skip to main content

Post-ablation tubal sterilization syndrome following NovaSure endometrial ablation: two case reports

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecological Surgery, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-ablation tubal sterilization syndrome following NovaSure endometrial ablation: two case reports
Published in
Gynecological Surgery, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10397-012-0744-6
Authors

Teresa Tam, Corissa Elgar, Kelly Jirschele, Emily Lombard

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#11,150,690
of 12,534,936 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#70
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,352
of 188,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,534,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.