You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A new device for simple and accurate urinary pH testing by the Stone-former patient
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-3-209 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Felix Grases, Adrian Rodriguez, Francisco Berga, Antonia Costa-Bauza, Rafael Maria Prieto, Isabel Burdallo, Alfredo Cadarso, Cecilia Jimenez-Jorquera, Antonio Baldi, Rosendo Garganta |
Abstract |
Urinary pH is an important factor linked to renal stone disease and a useful marker in the treatment of urolithiasis. Although the gold standard for measuring urinary pH utilizes a glass electrode and a pH meter, at present dipstick testing is largely used to estimate urinary pH. However, the accuracy and precision of this method may be insufficient for making clinical decisions in patients with lithiasis. The aim of this study is to describe a new device for urinary pH testing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 19% |
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
Engineering | 8 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
Chemistry | 5 | 10% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,698,066
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,198
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,443
of 227,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#49
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.