↓ Skip to main content

A Pilot Study to Examine the Correlation between Cognition and Blood Biomarkers in a Singapore Chinese Male Cohort with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Pilot Study to Examine the Correlation between Cognition and Blood Biomarkers in a Singapore Chinese Male Cohort with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Amanda Goh, Yanhong Dong, Wah Yean Lee, Way Inn Koay, Stephen Ziyang Tay, Danny Soon, Christopher Chen, Claire Frances Brittain, Stephen Loucian Lowe, Boon-Seng Wong

Abstract

Diabetes is reported to be linked to poorer cognitive function. The purpose of this study is to examine (a) clinical correlation between cognitive function and the biochemical perturbations in T2DM, and (b) the impact of statin treatment on cognitive function in diabetic subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Bulgaria 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Psychology 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Philosophy 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,407
of 194,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,085
of 227,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,532
of 4,702 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,702 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.