↓ Skip to main content

Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
55 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003824.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijaya M Musini, Mark Nazer, Ken Bassett, James M Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 183 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 22 12%
Other 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Other 46 25%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 32 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#457,526
of 14,389,085 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,277
of 10,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,120
of 189,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,389,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.