You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Translating evidence-based interventions for implementation: Experiences from Project HEAL in African American churches
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-66 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cheryl L Holt, Erin K Tagai, Mary Ann Scheirer, Sherie Lou Z Santos, Janice Bowie, Muhiuddin Haider, Jimmie L Slade, Min Qi Wang, Tony Whitehead |
Abstract |
Community-based approaches have been increasing in the effort to raise awareness and early detection for cancer and other chronic disease. However, many times, such interventions are tested in randomized trials, become evidence-based, and then fail to reach further use in the community. Project HEAL (Health through Early Awareness and Learning) is an implementation trial that aims to compare two strategies of implementing evidence-based cancer communication interventions in African American faith-based organizations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 16% |
Psychology | 13 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,319
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,467
of 241,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#29
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.