You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Body image in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of psychometric properties between four patient-reported outcome instruments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-12-81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonia Matamalas, Joan Bagó, Elisabetta D'Agata, Ferran Pellisé |
| Abstract |
Four patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are commonly used to assess body image in idiopathic scoliosis (IS): the Quality of Life Profile for Spinal Deformities (QLPSD), SRS-22 Self-Image scale, Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ), and Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS). The aim of this study is to compare the psychometric properties of these instruments in patients with IS and report the translational/cultural adaptation of the SAQ to Spanish. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 25% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,668
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,868
of 227,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.