↓ Skip to main content

Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010252.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luit Penninga, André Wettergren, Colin H Wilson, An-Wen Chan, Daniel A Steinbrüchel, Christian Gluud

Abstract

Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for end-stage liver failure. To date, no consensus has been reached on the use of immunosuppressive T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction of immunosuppression after liver transplantation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 177 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 20%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 45 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#9,618,891
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,474
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,910
of 189,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.