↓ Skip to main content

Gait training early after stroke with a new exoskeleton – the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gait training early after stroke with a new exoskeleton – the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anneli Nilsson, Katarina Vreede, Vera Häglund, Hiroaki Kawamoto, Yoshiyuki Sankai, Jörgen Borg

Abstract

Intensive task specific training early after stroke may enhance beneficial neuroplasticity and functional recovery. Impaired gait after hemiparetic stroke remains a challenge that may be approached early after stroke by use of novel technology. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of the exoskeleton Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for intensive gait training as part of a regular inpatient rehabilitation program for hemiparetic patients with severely impaired gait early after stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 258 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Student > Master 50 19%
Researcher 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 91 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 12%
Neuroscience 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 52 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,494,168
of 12,018,016 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#303
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,408
of 193,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,018,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.