You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Construction of a SNP-based genetic linkage map in cultivated peanut based on large scale marker development using next-generation double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-351 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaojing Zhou, Youlin Xia, Xiaoping Ren, Yulin Chen, Li Huang, Shunmou Huang, Boshou Liao, Yong Lei, Liyin Yan, Huifang Jiang |
| Abstract |
Cultivated peanut, or groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), is an important oilseed crop with an allotetraploid genome (AABB, 2n = 4x = 40). In recent years, many efforts have been made to construct linkage maps in cultivated peanut, but almost all of these maps were constructed using low-throughput molecular markers, and most show a low density, directly influencing the value of their applications. With advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, the construction of high-density genetic maps has become more achievable in a cost-effective and rapid manner. The objective of this study was to establish a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based genetic map for cultivated peanut by analyzing next-generation double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) reads. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 32% |
| Researcher | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,466,810
of 24,080,653 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,356
of 10,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,941
of 231,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#47
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,080,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,897 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.