You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tiotropium Respimat® in asthma: a double-blind, randomised, dose-ranging study in adult patients with moderate asthma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respiratory Research, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-15-61 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kai-Michael Beeh, Petra Moroni-Zentgraf, Othmar Ablinger, Zuzana Hollaenderova, Anna Unseld, Michael Engel, Stephanie Korn |
Abstract |
Tiotropium, a once-daily long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator, when administered via Respimat(R) (tiotropium Respimat(R)) significantly reduces the risk of severe exacerbations and improves lung function in patients with severe persistent asthma that is not fully controlled despite using inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta2-agonists. To further explore the dose-response curve in asthma, we investigated the efficacy and safety of three different doses of tiotropium Respimat(R) as add-on to ICS in symptomatic patients with moderate persistent asthma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 11 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,103
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,103
of 242,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.