↓ Skip to main content

Orçamento público, região e financiamento em saúde: rendas do petróleo e desigualdades entre municípios

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orçamento público, região e financiamento em saúde: rendas do petróleo e desigualdades entre municípios
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2015
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320152010.00722015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Delba Machado Barros, Luciana Dias de Lima

Abstract

The effects of the allocation of revenues from oil production on socioeconomic development and the funding of public policies have been questioned in the literature. The main objective of this study was to analyze the importance of financial compensation - in the form of royalties and special participation - for public financing of local health services in the Norte Fluminense region of Rio de Janeiro State, namely the state bordering on the offshore area that accounts for more than 70% of the oil produced in Brazil. The methodology involved secondary data analysis of municipal health revenues and expenditures in the 2000s. The results suggest that the variation in oil-derived budget funds were correlated to the significant difference in total health spending in the region's municipalities. However, the execution and distribution of health spending by specialty did not occur proportionally to the variation in the availability of revenues. The heavy dependence on oil revenues suggests greater municipal autonomy in health spending when compared to other municipalities in Brazil. The conclusion drawn is that other criteria for the distribution and use of funds are needed in order to equalize spending and streamline governmental actions in the regional sphere.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 38%
Librarian 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,444,703
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,616
of 1,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,163
of 275,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,879 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.