You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor – patient satisfaction and mortality
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neurology, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-14-120 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mari Naumann Børretzen, Silje Bjerknes, Terje Sæhle, Mona Skjelland, Inger Marie Skogseid, Mathias Toft, Espen Dietrichs |
Abstract |
Ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for tremor, but there is limited data on long-term efficacy and mortality after VIM-DBS. Here we report the analysis of patient satisfaction and mortality in all patients treated in our center 1996-2010 with VIM-DBS for essential tremor (ET). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 13% |
Engineering | 9 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Psychology | 6 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,196,917
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,220
of 2,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,727
of 228,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#24
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.