↓ Skip to main content

Rare mutations in SQSTM1 modify susceptibility to frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rare mutations in SQSTM1 modify susceptibility to frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00401-014-1298-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie van der Zee, Tim Van Langenhove, Gabor G. Kovacs, Lubina Dillen, William Deschamps, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Radoslav Matěj, Mathieu Vandenbulcke, Anne Sieben, Bart Dermaut, Katrien Smets, Philip Van Damme, Céline Merlin, Annelies Laureys, Marleen Van Den Broeck, Maria Mattheijssens, Karin Peeters, Luisa Benussi, Giuliano Binetti, Roberta Ghidoni, Barbara Borroni, Alessandro Padovani, Silvana Archetti, Pau Pastor, Cristina Razquin, Sara Ortega-Cubero, Isabel Hernández, Mercè Boada, Agustín Ruiz, Alexandre de Mendonça, Gabriel Miltenberger-Miltényi, Frederico Simões do Couto, Sandro Sorbi, Benedetta Nacmias, Silvia Bagnoli, Caroline Graff, Huei-Hsin Chiang, Håkan Thonberg, Robert Perneczky, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Panagiotis Alexopoulos, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Christian Bonvicini, Matthis Synofzik, Walter Maetzler, Jennifer Müller vom Hagen, Ludger Schöls, Tobias B. Haack, Tim M. Strom, Holger Prokisch, Oriol Dols-Icardo, Jordi Clarimón, Alberto Lleó, Isabel Santana, Maria Rosário Almeida, Beatriz Santiago, Michael T. Heneka, Frank Jessen, Alfredo Ramirez, Raquel Sanchez-Valle, Albert Llado, Ellen Gelpi, Stayko Sarafov, Ivailo Tournev, Albena Jordanova, Eva Parobkova, Gian Maria Fabrizi, Silvia Testi, Eric Salmon, Thomas Ströbel, Patrick Santens, Wim Robberecht, Peter De Jonghe, Jean-Jacques Martin, Patrick Cras, Rik Vandenberghe, Peter Paul De Deyn, Marc Cruts, Kristel Sleegers, Christine Van Broeckhoven

Abstract

Mutations in the gene coding for Sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) have been genetically associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Paget disease of bone. In the present study, we analyzed the SQSTM1 coding sequence for mutations in an extended cohort of 1,808 patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), ascertained within the European Early-Onset Dementia consortium. As control dataset, we sequenced 1,625 European control individuals and analyzed whole-exome sequence data of 2,274 German individuals (total n = 3,899). Association of rare SQSTM1 mutations was calculated in a meta-analysis of 4,332 FTLD and 10,240 control alleles. We identified 25 coding variants in FTLD patients of which 10 have not been described. Fifteen mutations were absent in the control individuals (carrier frequency <0.00026) whilst the others were rare in both patients and control individuals. When pooling all variants with a minor allele frequency <0.01, an overall frequency of 3.2 % was calculated in patients. Rare variant association analysis between patients and controls showed no difference over the whole protein, but suggested that rare mutations clustering in the UBA domain of SQSTM1 may influence disease susceptibility by doubling the risk for FTLD (RR = 2.18 [95 % CI 1.24-3.85]; corrected p value = 0.042). Detailed histopathology demonstrated that mutations in SQSTM1 associate with widespread neuronal and glial phospho-TDP-43 pathology. With this study, we provide further evidence for a putative role of rare mutations in SQSTM1 in the genetic etiology of FTLD and showed that, comparable to other FTLD/ALS genes, SQSTM1 mutations are associated with TDP-43 pathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 19%
Researcher 15 9%
Professor 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 32 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 13%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 48 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,405,869
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,277
of 2,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,160
of 228,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.