↓ Skip to main content

PTA Versus Carbofilm-Coated Stents in Infrapopliteal Arteries: Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PTA Versus Carbofilm-Coated Stents in Infrapopliteal Arteries: Pilot Study
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00270-005-0276-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Rand, A. Basile, M. Cejna, D. Fleischmann, M. Funovics, M. Gschwendtner, M. Haumer, I. Von Katzler, J. Kettenbach, F. Lomoschitz, C. Luft, E. Minar, B. Schneider, M. Schoder, J. Lammer

Abstract

To determine the primary success and short-term patency of stent application as a primary treatment modality for high-grade lesions of the infrapopliteal arteries compared with treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in critical limb ischemia in a randomized prospective study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 73%
Chemistry 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#641
of 2,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,818
of 60,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.