↓ Skip to main content

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
57 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
886 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
778 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000008.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip James Edwards, Ian Roberts, Mike J Clarke, Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Reinhard Wentz, Irene Kwan, Rachel Cooper, Lambert M Felix, Sarah Pratap

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 778 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 13 2%
Spain 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 739 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 145 19%
Student > Master 136 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 17%
Student > Bachelor 54 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 6%
Other 189 24%
Unknown 76 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 290 37%
Psychology 86 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 83 11%
Social Sciences 75 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 21 3%
Other 102 13%
Unknown 121 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#438,476
of 15,575,313 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,103
of 11,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,200
of 192,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,575,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.