You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Analysis of Salivary Bacterial Microbiome Diversity in Edentulous Infants and Their Mothers or Primary Care Givers Using Pyrosequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0023503 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kimberly D. Cephas, Juhee Kim, Rose Ann Mathai, Kathleen A. Barry, Scot E. Dowd, Brandon S. Meline, Kelly S. Swanson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 22% |
| Unknown | 44 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#111,212
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,587
of 134,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#911
of 2,408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.