↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol subacromial impingement syndrome: the identification of pathophysiologic mechanisms (SISTIM)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study protocol subacromial impingement syndrome: the identification of pathophysiologic mechanisms (SISTIM)
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pieter Bas de Witte, Jochem Nagels, Ewoud RA van Arkel, Cornelis PJ Visser, Rob GHH Nelissen, Jurriaan H de Groot

Abstract

The subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is the most common diagnosed disorder of the shoulder in primary health care, but its aetiology is unclear. Conservative treatment regimes focus at reduction of subacromial inflammatory reactions or pathologic scapulohumeral motion patterns (intrinsic aetiology). Long-lasting symptoms are often treated with surgery, which is focused at enlarging the subacromial space by resection of the anterior part of the acromion (based on extrinsic aetiology). Despite that acromionplasty is in the top-10 of orthopaedic surgical procedures, there is no consensus on its indications and reported results are variable (successful in 48-90%). We hypothesize that the aetiology of SIS, i.e. an increase in subacromial pressure or decrease of subacromial space, is multi-factorial. SIS can be the consequence of pathologic scapulohumeral motion patterns leading to humerus cranialisation, anatomical variations of the scapula and the humerus (e.g. hooked acromion), a subacromial inflammatory reaction (e.g. due to overuse or micro-trauma), or adjoining pathology (e.g. osteoarthritis in the acromion-clavicular-joint with subacromial osteophytes).We believe patients should be treated according to their predominant etiological mechanism(s). Therefore, the objective of our study is to identify and discriminate etiological mechanisms occurring in SIS patients, in order to develop tailored diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 239 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 21%
Student > Master 47 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 55 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 14%
Sports and Recreations 15 6%
Engineering 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 60 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,202,276
of 24,836,260 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,361
of 4,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,829
of 253,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#35
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,836,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.