↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003279.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Keogh, Saam Sedehizadeh, Paul Maddison

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Other 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 13 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,396,255
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,604
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,489
of 189,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.