↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical methods for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical methods for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Jozwiak, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Anthony J Kelly, Ben Willem J Mol, Olivier Irion, Michel Boulvain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 2%
Student > Bachelor 4 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 1%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 1%
Student > Master 3 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 180 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 183 90%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,267,894
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,889
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,167
of 170,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.