↓ Skip to main content

Automatic Prediction of Facial Trait Judgments: Appearance vs. Structural Models

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automatic Prediction of Facial Trait Judgments: Appearance vs. Structural Models
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Rojas Q., David Masip, Alexander Todorov, Jordi Vitria

Abstract

Evaluating other individuals with respect to personality characteristics plays a crucial role in human relations and it is the focus of attention for research in diverse fields such as psychology and interactive computer systems. In psychology, face perception has been recognized as a key component of this evaluation system. Multiple studies suggest that observers use face information to infer personality characteristics. Interactive computer systems are trying to take advantage of these findings and apply them to increase the natural aspect of interaction and to improve the performance of interactive computer systems. Here, we experimentally test whether the automatic prediction of facial trait judgments (e.g. dominance) can be made by using the full appearance information of the face and whether a reduced representation of its structure is sufficient. We evaluate two separate approaches: a holistic representation model using the facial appearance information and a structural model constructed from the relations among facial salient points. State of the art machine learning methods are applied to a) derive a facial trait judgment model from training data and b) predict a facial trait value for any face. Furthermore, we address the issue of whether there are specific structural relations among facial points that predict perception of facial traits. Experimental results over a set of labeled data (9 different trait evaluations) and classification rules (4 rules) suggest that a) prediction of perception of facial traits is learnable by both holistic and structural approaches; b) the most reliable prediction of facial trait judgments is obtained by certain type of holistic descriptions of the face appearance; and c) for some traits such as attractiveness and extroversion, there are relationships between specific structural features and social perceptions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 113 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Student > Master 13 10%
Researcher 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 36%
Computer Science 15 12%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,833,243
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,272
of 224,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,236
of 134,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#224
of 2,396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.